Saul0Wall
06-05-2007, 01:17 PM
I wonder if this technique is in anyway compatible with the "black-earth" or "black-soil" research? (Whatever it is called - the use of fish waste and bio-char to sequester carbon but which also holds water and nutrients that would otherwise run off and which stimulates biotic activity in the soil.)
I wondered if it might be feasible and beneficial to use some black-earth under or instead of the mulch.
I have also heard of a seaweed protein that someone was considering for use in desert reclamation projects due to its ability to hold water that would otherwise dry up. (Sounds like the fiber stuff they give you to keep the colon on the go but better.) If this could be combined with the "hydroseeding" to make it more effective in desert areas it might help by creating a grassy buffer between the reclaimed gullies and dryer nearby areas. It might help hold dew at the ground level instead of being lost to the desert sky.
Just a thought. Maybe others have suggested these ideas. One hears about differing reclamation efforts and ideas and it it natural to wonder if there is any potential cross fertilization.
I wondered if it might be feasible and beneficial to use some black-earth under or instead of the mulch.
I have also heard of a seaweed protein that someone was considering for use in desert reclamation projects due to its ability to hold water that would otherwise dry up. (Sounds like the fiber stuff they give you to keep the colon on the go but better.) If this could be combined with the "hydroseeding" to make it more effective in desert areas it might help by creating a grassy buffer between the reclaimed gullies and dryer nearby areas. It might help hold dew at the ground level instead of being lost to the desert sky.
Just a thought. Maybe others have suggested these ideas. One hears about differing reclamation efforts and ideas and it it natural to wonder if there is any potential cross fertilization.